|
President Rajapaksa explained the
need to seek a Sri Lankan solution, and not be confined
to the solutions in other countries, although he did
not rule out the possibility of some of those solutions
being suitable in the Sri Lankan context.
The President further explained to
Ambassador Boucher that the LTTE too should look at
the present opportunity to arrive at a negotiated settlement
and come for discussions, while also understanding that
acts of violence such as massacres of civilians, attacks
on children, Human Rights violations and the tactics
of terror cannot achieve the desired results for the
Tamil.
Referring to the pattern of violence
in the country, President Rajapaksa told Ambassador
there was a pattern of provocation and attempts to put
the blame on the government for acts which it would
never do. He also said the LTTE was seeking to provoke
reprisals from other sections of the Sri Lankan population.
He referred to the assassination of TNA parliamentarian
Joseph Pararajasingham at Christmas Midnight Service
inside a church; the attack at Trincomalee just before
the traditional Sinhala & Tamil New Year and Good
Friday; the and the attempt to attack a ship carrying
over 700 unarmed troops and ceasefire monitors on the
eve of the Vesak festival, the most important day in
the Buddhist calendar, which marked 2550th anniversary
of the Buddha’s birth.
Referring to possible allegations
of government complicity in acts of violence such as
the attack on the Udayan newspaper, the President questioned
as to why the government should carry out any such acts
which would only hurt itself, with this attack taking
place. He noted that this attack took place when a large
number of foreign journalists were in Colombo to mark
World Press Freedom Day.
President Rajapaksa also explained
the difficulties the government had in apprehending
and punishing those involved in certain acts of violence,
due to the lack of evidence as required by the Courts
in a democratic society. He said it was necessary for
it to be understood that the Government had to act within
the limits of a democratic society, and could not act
carry out summary justice as an illegal organization
may be able to.
|